A Note for the masses
Introduction
Busy expanding its lineup, Samsung is using a Sesame Street approach of sorts, going through the alphabet one letter at a time. For the most part, this naming scheme works well and helps avoid confusion. We know the "S" line is the place to get flagships, the upper-midrangers designated with an "A". Further down the price ladder, there is the budget "J" series and the Tizen-powered "Z".
But things have been getting a bit weirder lately with the introduction of the "On" lineup and the new "C" line. The latter currently includes the 5.2-inch Galaxy C5 and the 5.7-inch Galaxy C7. Both were made official in late May and are currently available in China and Hong-Kong, but have also got the all-clear from the FCC, which means they will likely be going international soon.
The hard bit is to guess how the C-line fits in Samsung's existing lineup. With midrange specs and slim all-metal bodies, the closest comparison seems to be to the Galaxy A lineup. The C5 and C7 do, however, bring about a few notable hardware improvements over the "A" models, so we're curious to see how the Koreans will market them.
Busy expanding its lineup, Samsung is using a Sesame Street approach of sorts, going through the alphabet one letter at a time. For the most part, this naming scheme works well and helps avoid confusion. We know the "S" line is the place to get flagships, the upper-midrangers designated with an "A". Further down the price ladder, there is the budget "J" series and the Tizen-powered "Z".
But things have been getting a bit weirder lately with the introduction of the "On" lineup and the new "C" line. The latter currently includes the 5.2-inch Galaxy C5 and the 5.7-inch Galaxy C7. Both were made official in late May and are currently available in China and Hong-Kong, but have also got the all-clear from the FCC, which means they will likely be going international soon.
The hard bit is to guess how the C-line fits in Samsung's existing lineup. With midrange specs and slim all-metal bodies, the closest comparison seems to be to the Galaxy A lineup. The C5 and C7 do, however, bring about a few notable hardware improvements over the "A" models, so we're curious to see how the Koreans will market them.
Samsung Galaxy C7 key features
- 156.6 x 77.2 x 6.8 mm, 169g body
- 5.7" 1080 x 1920px Super AMOLED of 386 ppi; 2.5D scratch-resistant glass
- Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 chipset, octa-core 2.0GHz Cortex-A53 CPU; Adreno 506 GPU; 4GB RAM
- 16MP, f/1.9 camera; 1080p@30fps video recording and Dual-LED flash
- 32GB or 64GB of built-in storage and a hybrid microSD card slot
- Dual-SIM connectivity
- LTE Cat.4 (150Mbps); Dual-band Wi-Fi a/b/g/n/ac; GPS/GLONASS/BDS (region dependent) receiver, Bluetooth v4.2, FM radio with RDS, NFC compatible with Samsung Pay
- Fingerprint reader in the home button
- Active noise cancellation with a dedicated mic
- 3,300mAh non-removable battery; Fast charging support
- 156.6 x 77.2 x 6.8 mm, 169g body
- 5.7" 1080 x 1920px Super AMOLED of 386 ppi; 2.5D scratch-resistant glass
- Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 chipset, octa-core 2.0GHz Cortex-A53 CPU; Adreno 506 GPU; 4GB RAM
- 16MP, f/1.9 camera; 1080p@30fps video recording and Dual-LED flash
- 32GB or 64GB of built-in storage and a hybrid microSD card slot
- Dual-SIM connectivity
- LTE Cat.4 (150Mbps); Dual-band Wi-Fi a/b/g/n/ac; GPS/GLONASS/BDS (region dependent) receiver, Bluetooth v4.2, FM radio with RDS, NFC compatible with Samsung Pay
- Fingerprint reader in the home button
- Active noise cancellation with a dedicated mic
- 3,300mAh non-removable battery; Fast charging support
Main shortcomings
- No OIS
- No phase detection, laser or other advanced autofocus technology
- No 4K video recording
- Cap on LTE speed
The Galaxy C5 and Galaxy C7 share most of their hardware. The same will likely be true for the alleged C9 as well, if and when it gets released. Design-wise the two handsets seem to differ only in scale and that same ratio is, in a way, applied to the chipset as well. The Snapdragon 625 is definitely a step up from the Snapdragon 617. Other than that, both phones have 4GB of RAM, 32GB or 64GB of expandable storage, mostly identical connectivity options and the same camera setup including a 16MP main unit and an 8MP front-facer.
Samsung's excellent Super AMOLED screen tech is also a given and panel size seems to be the decisive factor in comparing the new "C" models to existing counterparts. At 5.2 inches, the Galaxy C5 definitely looks like a spruced up version of the A5 (2016).
The C7, however, is a little more special. Its 5.7-inch diagonal puts it in the Note territory as far as screen real estate goes. That makes it a bit bigger than the currently available Galaxy A7 (2016) and the A9 (2016). The A8 is definitely a better match, but in the absence of a 2016 upgrade to said model, the C7 might be just on time to fill a gap.
The 5.7-inch form factor has stuck with the Note line for four generations now, so it definitely holds a lot of appeal. The Galaxy C7 might just be a perfect alternative for anyone who does not need the S Pen and all the extra features - and the resulting price premium - or isn't particularly fond of curved displays.
- No OIS
- No phase detection, laser or other advanced autofocus technology
- No 4K video recording
- Cap on LTE speed
The Galaxy C5 and Galaxy C7 share most of their hardware. The same will likely be true for the alleged C9 as well, if and when it gets released. Design-wise the two handsets seem to differ only in scale and that same ratio is, in a way, applied to the chipset as well. The Snapdragon 625 is definitely a step up from the Snapdragon 617. Other than that, both phones have 4GB of RAM, 32GB or 64GB of expandable storage, mostly identical connectivity options and the same camera setup including a 16MP main unit and an 8MP front-facer.
Samsung's excellent Super AMOLED screen tech is also a given and panel size seems to be the decisive factor in comparing the new "C" models to existing counterparts. At 5.2 inches, the Galaxy C5 definitely looks like a spruced up version of the A5 (2016).
The C7, however, is a little more special. Its 5.7-inch diagonal puts it in the Note territory as far as screen real estate goes. That makes it a bit bigger than the currently available Galaxy A7 (2016) and the A9 (2016). The A8 is definitely a better match, but in the absence of a 2016 upgrade to said model, the C7 might be just on time to fill a gap.
The 5.7-inch form factor has stuck with the Note line for four generations now, so it definitely holds a lot of appeal. The Galaxy C7 might just be a perfect alternative for anyone who does not need the S Pen and all the extra features - and the resulting price premium - or isn't particularly fond of curved displays.
Synthetic benchmarks
The Samsung Galaxy C7 is not a powerhouse by any standards. It makes use of a Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 SoC with a total of eight Cortex-A53 cores, running at 2.0 GHz. But the real trick to the chip is that it is manufactured using a 14nm process. It is the same fabrication process Qualcomm uses for its top-tier chips like the Snapdragon 820 and is still quite uncommon in mid-range chips.
In fact, the only other similar mobile chip we have encountered was the Samsung-made Exynos 7870 inside the Galaxy J7 (2016). It is also based on a 14nm process and uses a total of eight Cortex-A53 cores, only clocked a little lower at 1.7 GHz. It allowed the J7 to shine regarding battery life, and it is a similar story with the C7.
Coming back to the benchmarks themselves, the Galaxy C7 can definitely hold its own against competitors. When we picked the competitions, we put the emphasis on display size at and above 5.7 inches, but we tried to stay as close as possible to starting price of the C7, which is around $430. Alternative phones like the Samsung Galaxy Note5 or the Galaxy s6 edge+ may be a bit over budget, but not by a lot. We also threw in the Galaxy C5 and the A5 (2016) and A7 (2016) for a clearer overall picture.
Looking at the all-round benchmarks first, we clearly see the Galaxy C7 holds its ground among mid-rangers. Of course, it is not exactly a fair performance fight when we pit it against flagships like the LeEco Le Max 2, the Nexus 6P or the Galaxy Note5. However, the advantage of a higher clock speed becomes evident when we consider how close the C7 has come in its AnTuTu score to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 or the Samsung Galaxy A9, both having the benefit of more powerful cores in their setup.
The Samsung Galaxy C7 is not a powerhouse by any standards. It makes use of a Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 SoC with a total of eight Cortex-A53 cores, running at 2.0 GHz. But the real trick to the chip is that it is manufactured using a 14nm process. It is the same fabrication process Qualcomm uses for its top-tier chips like the Snapdragon 820 and is still quite uncommon in mid-range chips.
In fact, the only other similar mobile chip we have encountered was the Samsung-made Exynos 7870 inside the Galaxy J7 (2016). It is also based on a 14nm process and uses a total of eight Cortex-A53 cores, only clocked a little lower at 1.7 GHz. It allowed the J7 to shine regarding battery life, and it is a similar story with the C7.
Coming back to the benchmarks themselves, the Galaxy C7 can definitely hold its own against competitors. When we picked the competitions, we put the emphasis on display size at and above 5.7 inches, but we tried to stay as close as possible to starting price of the C7, which is around $430. Alternative phones like the Samsung Galaxy Note5 or the Galaxy s6 edge+ may be a bit over budget, but not by a lot. We also threw in the Galaxy C5 and the A5 (2016) and A7 (2016) for a clearer overall picture.
Looking at the all-round benchmarks first, we clearly see the Galaxy C7 holds its ground among mid-rangers. Of course, it is not exactly a fair performance fight when we pit it against flagships like the LeEco Le Max 2, the Nexus 6P or the Galaxy Note5. However, the advantage of a higher clock speed becomes evident when we consider how close the C7 has come in its AnTuTu score to the Xiaomi Redmi Note 3 or the Samsung Galaxy A9, both having the benefit of more powerful cores in their setup.
Tags
Previews